<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital vs print coverage - which would you prefer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/digital-vs-print-coverage-which-would-you-prefer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/digital-vs-print-coverage-which-would-you-prefer/</link>
	<description>Online PR and social media consultancy focusing on the technology and digital industries.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Gofton</title>
		<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/digital-vs-print-coverage-which-would-you-prefer/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Gofton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/digital-vs-print-coverage-which-would-you-prefer/#comment-842</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim

I completely agree, this is great news for us all. If we can also improve the understanding of the board members and those that have the final say, we'll be getting somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim</p>
<p>I completely agree, this is great news for us all. If we can also improve the understanding of the board members and those that have the final say, we&#8217;ll be getting somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim hoang</title>
		<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/digital-vs-print-coverage-which-would-you-prefer/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>tim hoang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/digital-vs-print-coverage-which-would-you-prefer/#comment-841</guid>
		<description>The most promising detail of the topic was that these were in-house PROs - the people making the decision and paying us in most cases. Fingers crossed they will become more savvy and realise the value of having online "coverage" (if there is anypoint still calling it that"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most promising detail of the topic was that these were in-house PROs - the people making the decision and paying us in most cases. Fingers crossed they will become more savvy and realise the value of having online &#8220;coverage&#8221; (if there is anypoint still calling it that&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
