<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-Consultancy roundtable: Who owns online PR?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/</link>
	<description>Online PR and social media consultancy focusing on the technology and digital industries.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aliya Zaidi</title>
		<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Aliya Zaidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberatemedia.com/uncategorized/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>Hi Wendy, 

It was good to see you last week. Overall it was a good discussion and we definitely came away with some good key learning points. 

We've just published the Roundtable Briefing notes here, available as a free download for registered users: 
http://tinyurl.com/63rpxr

With regards to ownership of Online PR; because online PR can be seen as a separate part of the overall marketing mix, this makes it difficult to measure its overall success as part of an integrated communications campaign, especially as many campaigns incorporate both online and offline PR activity. 

A newer definition of OPR is needed to address the fact that PR is a complex marketing discipline including corporate, public affairs, analyst relations, internal communications etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wendy, </p>
<p>It was good to see you last week. Overall it was a good discussion and we definitely came away with some good key learning points. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve just published the Roundtable Briefing notes here, available as a free download for registered users:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/63rpxr" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/63rpxr</a></p>
<p>With regards to ownership of Online PR; because online PR can be seen as a separate part of the overall marketing mix, this makes it difficult to measure its overall success as part of an integrated communications campaign, especially as many campaigns incorporate both online and offline PR activity. </p>
<p>A newer definition of OPR is needed to address the fact that PR is a complex marketing discipline including corporate, public affairs, analyst relations, internal communications etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles</title>
		<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberatemedia.com/uncategorized/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>Very true. It would be interesting to see if it moves chapters on the pages of text books over the next 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true. It would be interesting to see if it moves chapters on the pages of text books over the next 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy McAuliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy McAuliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberatemedia.com/uncategorized/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>In essence, I agree no one has to own it per say, but with confusion brand-side around what is online PR and where it should sit in the marketing mix etc...there is clearly a case to be made for defining Online PR better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In essence, I agree no one has to own it per say, but with confusion brand-side around what is online PR and where it should sit in the marketing mix etc&#8230;there is clearly a case to be made for defining Online PR better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles</title>
		<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/blog/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberatemedia.com/uncategorized/e-consultancy-roundtable-who-owns-online-pr/#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have to own online PR? Surely whoever does it best will win out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have to own online PR? Surely whoever does it best will win out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
