<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers: slow down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberatemedia.com/uncategorized/bloggers-slow-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/uncategorized/bloggers-slow-down/</link>
	<description>Liberate Media blends online PR with offline PR expertise to form a uniquely positioned social media agency.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Yan</title>
		<link>http://www.liberatemedia.com/uncategorized/bloggers-slow-down/#comment-5163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberatemedia.com/?p=1418#comment-5163</guid>
		<description>Excellent points, Lloyd. When I went to blogging nearly weekly (from daily a couple of years ago), I didn’t lose many readers who were catching me via the RSS feed. I simply felt I could not blog with the same quality regularly; plus I often blogged about branding principles, and these things do not change much over time. There was no need to revise theory. If readers wanted quantity over quality, they could always go to another blog where I was putting the everyday junk; but the main blog that bears my name would only have the thought-out, deeper posts. Slow blogging has worked for me.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jack Yans last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.jackyan.com/blog/2008/11/tv-news-gets-on-high-horse-about-evil.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;TV news gets on high horse about the evil internet again&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points, Lloyd. When I went to blogging nearly weekly (from daily a couple of years ago), I didn’t lose many readers who were catching me via the RSS feed. I simply felt I could not blog with the same quality regularly; plus I often blogged about branding principles, and these things do not change much over time. There was no need to revise theory. If readers wanted quantity over quality, they could always go to another blog where I was putting the everyday junk; but the main blog that bears my name would only have the thought-out, deeper posts. Slow blogging has worked for me.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Jack Yans last blog post..<a href="http://www.jackyan.com/blog/2008/11/tv-news-gets-on-high-horse-about-evil.html" rel="nofollow">TV news gets on high horse about the evil internet again</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

